One of my jobs as an intern is to keep the team I work with here and in New York updated on things specific to ESPN as a company and in the Digital Sales/Advertising industries. To do so, I will be pulling information from articles on various online publications to come up with what I call the EAS AAM Weekly Newsletter! Below is a copy of last weeks letter, which I sent out on Friday. I will post these weekly!
Weekly EAS AAM Newsletter
ESPN a WC Mobile Success
The airing of the WC on ESPN Mobile TV channel is MobiTV’s highest performing live event to date. As of last Friday, 88 million minutes of live WC action had been viewed on mobile screens across America.
http://moconews.net/article/419-world-cup-goes-digital-only-for-some/
Official Sponsors Trump “Ambushers” After Start of World Cup
Study from the Neilson Company shows that brands like Nike and Carlsberg (not official WC sponsors), labeled as “Ambushers,” got the most online buzz around their brand before the start of WC action. However, 2 weeks in, Adidas and Hyundai (official sponsors) have now moved up in ranks thanks to exposure during the live streaming of the matches. Adidas now holds number one spot for most online buzz. http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=144773
Foursquare and CNN, Unsuccessful WC Partnership
Foursquare partnered with CNN to encourage fans to “check-in” with their mobile devices to win special badges, like “South Africa Explorer” for people traveling to the WC or “Super Fan” for those attending games. It was a flop. For the tens of thousands of fans in attendance, the Elkah Stadium in Johannesburg only got 241 check-ins.
ESPN and ACC Reach 12-Year Agreement
ESPN gains exclusive rights to every conference-controlled football/men’s basketball/women’s basketball/Olympic sports games and conference championships. Both parties are very excited about the deal.
Google Dominates Smartphone Platforms
All major smartphone platforms lost share to Google Android in recent 3 month period. From Feb 2010 to May 2010, while Apple and Microsoft lost 1-2 percent of marketshare, Google gained 4.
http://moconews.net/article/419-android-gains-marketshare-while-all-others-lose-it/
World Cup Final this Sunday!
Shout out to Alex Pepperl, who is still in the running to win the team jersey if Netherlands takes it.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Friday, July 2, 2010
Does Google Belong in Your Living Room?
Google Web, Google Images, Google Videos, Google Maps, Google News, Google Shopping Google Mail, Google Books, Google Finance, Google Translate, Google Scholar….I think I’ve made my point, but the list still goes on. What can’t Google do for you? The phrase “Google it” seems to be the solution to any unsolved problem. And Google hasn’t just limited itself to household use, it’s even expanded to the mobile market (the fastest growing market today) with the Android OS, giving the iPhone a run for its money. There is one giant piece of the puzzle missing though, and Google knows exactly what that is. Television. The average American watches 4.5 hours of it per day. TV drives nearly 70 billion dollars in advertising per year. TV matters. It seems a logical next step for companies such as Google and Apple to get involved, right? Well, it really isn’t that simple. Apple did take a stab at TV with Apple TV, but it wasn’t successful, and Steve Jobs admitted that it was simply a hobby and that he believes the TV industry is nearly impossible to overhaul. But for the first time, with Google TV, we may see some success. Google is bringing something entirely different to the table this time, and the keys lie in their timing along with content, technology, and their path to market.
What exactly is Google TV? The video below will tell you, in Google’s own words.
An important point to take from this is that Google believes they have pinpointed the problem with TV today: the user has to change their schedule to fit their TV schedule. I guess I can relate to this, seeing as Monday nights I find myself moving my usual work-out aside in order to catch the newest Bachelorette episode (embarrassing as that is to admit). Google recognizes this, and believes that more and more people are watching shows online these days anyway due to the pure convenience of it. They ultimately ask us this question:
With this, Google believes they will, “turn the living room into a new platform for innovation.” But what does this mean for advertising dollars? In the immediate future, very little. For now, the ad opportunities will remain in the content itself. Senior Product Manager Rishi Chandra said, "We want to get the product experience right first." But Chandra also believes that we will soon see similar developments as with the mobile industry; sites will begin to mold and evolve for the Web TV experience. But as the product becomes more available and usable, Google will be constantly working to innovate it. With that, we can predict that they will likely capitalize on Google TV Ads (http://www.google.com/adwords/tvads/) with new ad formats in attempts to grab some of the share of the nearly 70 billion TV ad dollars floating out there.
If successful, Google hopes they can someday completely change the face of advertising by, in the words of Henrique De Castro (Google's Global VP of Media & Platforms), “unbundling the ad from the content.” Commercials can become highly personalized, just as ads can be on the Web, and Google has provided a few examples of possible changes to come. The complexity of ads will change and be very dynamic by taking cues from the weather, traffic, political conditions, or even game results. What if you woke up to a rainy Seattle day and your Google TV plays you ads for new rain boots or a trip to Disneyland, then days later a heat wave arrives and Home Depot is exposing you to an air conditioner? They will also have the ability, based on your history in using the product, to provide you with things relevant to your personal life. “Social is Life. Life is social…” De Castro said, stressing the point that constant connection is important to people these days, something that Google TV can provide.
Personally, I don’t know what to think about it. My generation is programmed to accept innovations and changes, and I generally fit into this stereo type. I’m all for the advancement of technology. But when is it going too far? Is Google going to take over the world? Will Google know more about it’s users than they know about themselves? I'm not too concerned with this, but there are a lot of people out there who are. While reading articles concerning Google TV, I found tons of negative feedback. Comments like, “Call me paranoid, but this sounds like a bad sci-fi movie becoming a reality!” or “I wonder how long it will take for the Department of Homeland Security to starts accessing the data!” Also, many people associate the TV with sitting back and relaxing, crashing, and being entertained, not with interacting. However, as proven over the past decade, things change and they change fast. So if Google TV truly is a success, who knows what is in store for TV in the next few years.
SOURCES:
CMS Wire:
http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-engagement/google-tv-is-taking-digital-advertising-on-a-wild-ride--007917.php
Google TV:
http://www.google.com/tv/
James McQuivey:
http://blogs.forrester.com/james_mcquivey/10-06-10-google_tv_bigger_deal_you_think
All Things Digital:
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100630/hulu-ceo-jason-kilar-were-no-cable-killer-we-swear/
What exactly is Google TV? The video below will tell you, in Google’s own words.
An important point to take from this is that Google believes they have pinpointed the problem with TV today: the user has to change their schedule to fit their TV schedule. I guess I can relate to this, seeing as Monday nights I find myself moving my usual work-out aside in order to catch the newest Bachelorette episode (embarrassing as that is to admit). Google recognizes this, and believes that more and more people are watching shows online these days anyway due to the pure convenience of it. They ultimately ask us this question:
"If the web is so smart, and our TV’s are so fun to watch, why do we have to choose? Why can’t they work together?"Starting this Fall, people won’t have to choose anymore because Google TV will launch. Now, let’s address the keys to their predicted success. Timing is crucial because we are living in a world where the technology is available to do something like this, and Google is going to use it to the full potential. Content is also a crucial piece. With users already spending countless hours per day on the web--in addition to watching TV--there is plenty of material out there that people want to watch, and they do it on their computers because it is the best/only option. If they had to choose between watching it on their 17” laptop or their 42” flat screen, which do you think would win? I’m guessing the latter. What makes Google most unique in their approach and gives them what seems to be the biggest advantage is the path to market they have laid out for themselves. They have partnered with Sony, Logitech, and Intel to put Google TV inside of televisions, Blu-ray players, and companion boxes, which will be available at Best Buy this Fall.
With this, Google believes they will, “turn the living room into a new platform for innovation.” But what does this mean for advertising dollars? In the immediate future, very little. For now, the ad opportunities will remain in the content itself. Senior Product Manager Rishi Chandra said, "We want to get the product experience right first." But Chandra also believes that we will soon see similar developments as with the mobile industry; sites will begin to mold and evolve for the Web TV experience. But as the product becomes more available and usable, Google will be constantly working to innovate it. With that, we can predict that they will likely capitalize on Google TV Ads (http://www.google.com/adwords/tvads/) with new ad formats in attempts to grab some of the share of the nearly 70 billion TV ad dollars floating out there.
If successful, Google hopes they can someday completely change the face of advertising by, in the words of Henrique De Castro (Google's Global VP of Media & Platforms), “unbundling the ad from the content.” Commercials can become highly personalized, just as ads can be on the Web, and Google has provided a few examples of possible changes to come. The complexity of ads will change and be very dynamic by taking cues from the weather, traffic, political conditions, or even game results. What if you woke up to a rainy Seattle day and your Google TV plays you ads for new rain boots or a trip to Disneyland, then days later a heat wave arrives and Home Depot is exposing you to an air conditioner? They will also have the ability, based on your history in using the product, to provide you with things relevant to your personal life. “Social is Life. Life is social…” De Castro said, stressing the point that constant connection is important to people these days, something that Google TV can provide.
Personally, I don’t know what to think about it. My generation is programmed to accept innovations and changes, and I generally fit into this stereo type. I’m all for the advancement of technology. But when is it going too far? Is Google going to take over the world? Will Google know more about it’s users than they know about themselves? I'm not too concerned with this, but there are a lot of people out there who are. While reading articles concerning Google TV, I found tons of negative feedback. Comments like, “Call me paranoid, but this sounds like a bad sci-fi movie becoming a reality!” or “I wonder how long it will take for the Department of Homeland Security to starts accessing the data!” Also, many people associate the TV with sitting back and relaxing, crashing, and being entertained, not with interacting. However, as proven over the past decade, things change and they change fast. So if Google TV truly is a success, who knows what is in store for TV in the next few years.
SOURCES:
CMS Wire:
http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-engagement/google-tv-is-taking-digital-advertising-on-a-wild-ride--007917.php
Google TV:
http://www.google.com/tv/
James McQuivey:
http://blogs.forrester.com/james_mcquivey/10-06-10-google_tv_bigger_deal_you_think
All Things Digital:
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100630/hulu-ceo-jason-kilar-were-no-cable-killer-we-swear/
Thursday, July 1, 2010
First Thursday
I am furiously researching and reading through advertising publications for inspiration for my next big post, but in the mean time, I thought I would share something pretty cool that I did on my lunch break. For living in the Seattle area my entire life, I'm beginning to realize I sure don't know much about it. Something awesome I discovered today is that every first Thursday of the month all the museums in Seattle are free. I took advantage of this by checking out the Seattle Art Museum (SAM) with my cousin and his girlfriend. The current exhibits include: Kurt (a dedication to Kurt Cobain) and "love fear pleasure lust pain glamour death" — Andy Warhol Media Works.
I don't really know much about Kurt Cobain or Nirvana, but I can say I still appreciated it. Loud music, sculptures, paintings, drawings, "doodles", and video made this an incredibly chaotic and dynamic veiwing, not your typical presumption about an art gallery experience. Then again, how else could you convey the essence of Kurt?
Of the two, I definitely prefered the Warhol exhibit. Much of it consisted of huge projections of his silent films. They were basically just hour long videos of close up shots of various peoples faces. They seemed simple enough, but I soon realized that they were all so different. Just the emotions expressed on each individuals faces changed the mood of each film; one man was smoking a cigarette, one woman smiling and giggling, one practically pulling her hair out, and one had tears running down her cheeks. The projections reminded me of a class I took my freshman year called DXARTS 200 (Digital Arts and New Media). I couldn't help but think about what a realatively new experience I was having. In the past, no one would have accepted this as art, which is why it is so amazing that Warhol did these decades ago.
Can I tie this into my job and the online advertising industry? Well, I can try. Art is incredibly dynamic, and proving to change the way we think on a daily basis. But it requires bold pioneers and new thinkers to make these changes come to life. There really is no set definition of what art is in our world today. In a similar fashion, the advertising world is also incredibly dynamic. Finding new ways to reach consumers requires constant innovation and evolving technology. Also, the types of ads we see continue to change. Contraversial or confusing advertisments are sometimes the most effective, challenging or captivating the minds of millions of consumers and imbeding the brand in their everyday thoughts.
Here are some contraversial/extreme ads of 2010 I came accross on One Extra Pixel
(http://www.onextrapixel.com/2010/02/25/80-extreme-advertisements-that-will-challenge-your-mind/)The ads are all very out of the box and almost shocking to look at. They are all produced by fairly well known brands, some more than others. See what you think for yourself!
I don't really know much about Kurt Cobain or Nirvana, but I can say I still appreciated it. Loud music, sculptures, paintings, drawings, "doodles", and video made this an incredibly chaotic and dynamic veiwing, not your typical presumption about an art gallery experience. Then again, how else could you convey the essence of Kurt?
Of the two, I definitely prefered the Warhol exhibit. Much of it consisted of huge projections of his silent films. They were basically just hour long videos of close up shots of various peoples faces. They seemed simple enough, but I soon realized that they were all so different. Just the emotions expressed on each individuals faces changed the mood of each film; one man was smoking a cigarette, one woman smiling and giggling, one practically pulling her hair out, and one had tears running down her cheeks. The projections reminded me of a class I took my freshman year called DXARTS 200 (Digital Arts and New Media). I couldn't help but think about what a realatively new experience I was having. In the past, no one would have accepted this as art, which is why it is so amazing that Warhol did these decades ago.
Can I tie this into my job and the online advertising industry? Well, I can try. Art is incredibly dynamic, and proving to change the way we think on a daily basis. But it requires bold pioneers and new thinkers to make these changes come to life. There really is no set definition of what art is in our world today. In a similar fashion, the advertising world is also incredibly dynamic. Finding new ways to reach consumers requires constant innovation and evolving technology. Also, the types of ads we see continue to change. Contraversial or confusing advertisments are sometimes the most effective, challenging or captivating the minds of millions of consumers and imbeding the brand in their everyday thoughts.
Here are some contraversial/extreme ads of 2010 I came accross on One Extra Pixel
(http://www.onextrapixel.com/2010/02/25/80-extreme-advertisements-that-will-challenge-your-mind/)The ads are all very out of the box and almost shocking to look at. They are all produced by fairly well known brands, some more than others. See what you think for yourself!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)